1996-03-09 - Re: U.S. State Dept criticizes Chinese net-censorship

Header Data

From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
Message Hash: d5454a42c3031ffbad64a47702e85b7500d6934d084de6a0746a42d44889fba9
Message ID: <clEAnke00YUuMq9H4t@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <9603082204.AB04688@cti02.citenet.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-09 05:09:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 13:09:40 +0800

Raw message

From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 13:09:40 +0800
To: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC,   Canada))
Subject: Re: U.S. State Dept criticizes Chinese net-censorship
In-Reply-To: <9603082204.AB04688@cti02.citenet.net>
Message-ID: <clEAnke00YUuMq9H4t@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 8-Mar-96 Re: U.S. State Dept
critici.. by JFA T. QC, Canada@citene 
> There is no such thing as "self-censorship".  Either you stick to 
> your values, and then it is *not* censorship, or then you do not,
> and then, it is neither.

Self-censorship does happen, and it's a growing problem in the arts
community. (I'm not a commercial artist, so this is my understanding
from other panelists and speakers at a conference I spoke at last month.)

Making art more palatable or less "extreme" to curry favor with
corporate patrons, or to get that NEA grant, or to get that faculty
position is self-censorship, and it does happen.

-Declan






Thread