1996-03-09 - Re: FCC v. Internet Phone?

Header Data

From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Message Hash: d5bf5abe623b87aa48995e8ab93aa0d469e9f74941a23d1056faed2d94559f0c
Message ID: <QlEIzV200YUvJBfG46@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <199603090248.VAA01654@bb.hks.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-09 10:52:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 18:52:15 +0800

Raw message

From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 18:52:15 +0800
To: wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Subject: Re: FCC v. Internet Phone?
In-Reply-To: <199603090248.VAA01654@bb.hks.net>
Message-ID: <QlEIzV200YUvJBfG46@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 8-Mar-96 FCC v. Internet Phone? by
Mutant Rob@unix.asb.com 
> I've done a scan of the NYT web site (www.nytimes.com) and the AP
> and Reuters... no mention of this at all, though there's a new blurb
> about another company promopting an Internet Phone type technology.

I was contacted by a reporter from the Boston Globe who plans to write
about it. Some net-publications have picked or soon will pick it up, I