1996-03-06 - Signature 2
Header Data
From: “Charles Choi (SAR)” <choi@virtu.sar.usf.edu>
To: Jim_Miller@bilbo.suite.com
Message Hash: d74c728a52cab93b4c258eeb2f5054b094d5e5251654b656672d2c7f3646c877
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960305202130.11469B-100000@virtu>
Reply To: <9603052110.AA00640@bilbo.suite.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-06 03:59:30 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:59:30 +0800
Raw message
From: "Charles Choi (SAR)" <choi@virtu.sar.usf.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:59:30 +0800
To: Jim_Miller@bilbo.suite.com
Subject: Signature 2
In-Reply-To: <9603052110.AA00640@bilbo.suite.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960305202130.11469B-100000@virtu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Decloaking...
Assumption 1 : a privacy key can become uncrackable.
Assumption 2 : an individual signature can become immune to fraud.
Posit : fuse the two together so that pseudonyms/aliases/online names ensure
complete privacy, but ensure that you talk to the same person
everytime.
Probably proposed already.
Cloaking...
Sincerely.
Quentin Holte.
( aka Charles Choi. )
You are all the Buddha.
- Last words
of Buddha.
If you see the Buddha,
kill him.
- Zen proverb.
Thread
Return to March 1996
- Return to ““Charles Choi (SAR)” <choi@virtu.sar.usf.edu>”
- Return to “Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>”
- Return to “jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)”
Return to ““Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>”
- 1996-03-07 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 01:48:47 +0800) - Re: art-stego - jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
- 1996-03-06 (Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:55:51 +0800) - Signature - “Charles Choi (SAR)” <choi@virtu.sar.usf.edu>
- 1996-03-07 (Thu, 7 Mar 1996 14:52:10 +0800) - Re: Signature - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
- 1996-03-06 (Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:59:30 +0800) - Signature 2 - “Charles Choi (SAR)” <choi@virtu.sar.usf.edu>
- 1996-03-07 (Thu, 7 Mar 1996 16:06:43 +0800) - Re: Signature 2 - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
- 1996-03-06 (Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:55:51 +0800) - Signature - “Charles Choi (SAR)” <choi@virtu.sar.usf.edu>