From: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Message Hash: d84ec1c034bae5d3d74c031d54f5655c5dee68f8b399940294a73a72cceb11e7
Message ID: <v02140b0aad60c739b098@[199.125.128.5]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-04 19:14:02 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 03:14:02 +0800
From: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 03:14:02 +0800
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Subject: Re: NYT on Crypto Bills
Message-ID: <v02140b0aad60c739b098@[199.125.128.5]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Well, my first objection is that this law could become something
like mail fraud. If the term "data coding" is used, it should be
carefully defined. After all, this letter is coded in ASCII. My
voice communications are digitized and coded by some algorithm
defined by the phone company.
-Peter
Return to March 1996
Return to “pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)”
1996-03-04 (Tue, 5 Mar 1996 03:14:02 +0800) - Re: NYT on Crypto Bills - pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)