1996-03-06 - Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!)

Header Data

From: Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d91335e6ffedb4fc0e9b828ee52958f048fe0a4a34633bf54f85c6c4fb1aa6fb
Message ID: <199603061331.IAA12263@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-06 14:14:28 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 22:14:28 +0800

Raw message

From: Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 22:14:28 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!)
Message-ID: <199603061331.IAA12263@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Christopher Allen wrote:
> What I am seeking is more than what is in the book:
> 
>   * are there are any links on the web to SEAL?

I tried skimming the web and found little relevant info.

[..]
>   * has anyone currently licensed it?

I have heard through the grapevine that Richard Mark's version of 
UUENCODE implements SEAL.

>   * should we be (the community) be looking at SEAL
>     for standards (say as an alternative to RC4?)?

RC4 is not patented, and AFAIK RSA is not actively seeking royalties etc. 
for using it. SEAL is patented/patent pending.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMT2TwioZzwIn1bdtAQEWnwF/arOP9WA0xMEFNtrPMUt4eTlUPzxRmTnf
qbfvyvd9Kd2H9BG4dNF1lgzVFLfj6GnI
=nzCA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread