1996-03-13 - Re: How’s that again?

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: jimbell@pacifier.com
Message Hash: dcd397841216e4bd2d2156d1a9fa2875db7812949651ac6d5bb346d0177a147c
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960312225120.27882A-100000@crl4.crl.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-13 21:54:06 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 05:54:06 +0800

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 05:54:06 +0800
To: jimbell@pacifier.com
Subject: Re: How's that again?
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960312225120.27882A-100000@crl4.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Jim and interested C'punks,

In response to a Jim Bell post I wrote:

> >Hey, Jim, don't forget me.  You are the only person I have ever
> >specifically UNinvited to one of my parties in over a decade of
> >hosting same.  I guess that makes you special.

To which Jim replied:
 
> You're confused.  You're describe YOUR reaction to ME, not MY reaction to 
> YOU.  And I am unaware of being invited to a "party," and now that I've 
> discovered what a sleazy person Alan Olsen and his merry band are, it is 
> really doubtful that I would have enjoyed what was advertised as a 
> cypherpunks meeting, but which you now claim was a "party."  Your level of 
> "honesty" is showing.

A)  It is you who is confused (see below)

B)  I'm not Alan Olsen (nor a member of his merry band, so I have
    no idea what you are talking about.

C)  There was a Cypherpunk meeting followed by a party.  The
    pictures are on the Web.

D)  It is your level of honesty that is showing.  As can be seen
    from the two messages (below) I sent you at the time.  They
    quote you in pertinent part.

>From sandfort@crl10.crl.comTue Mar 12 19:04:00 1996
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 22:59:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl10.crl.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: PARTY-PARTY-PARTY

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Jim,

You wrote:

> Putting the nearest city in the note would have been helpful.

Did you try looking at the actual invitation?


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>From sandfort@crl12.crl.comTue Mar 12 19:04:17 1996
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 08:24:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl12.crl.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: PARTY-PARTY-PARTY

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Jim,

You moaned:

> I didn't feel inclined to waste 2-3 minutes of my time cranking
> up Netscape, and looking at a homepage or whereever the actual
> information was. 
> 
> I consider such behavior exceedingly rude.

I feel your pain.  Invitation withdrawn; problem solved.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

NOW do you remember?


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~










Thread