From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: jimbell@pacifier.com
Message Hash: dcd397841216e4bd2d2156d1a9fa2875db7812949651ac6d5bb346d0177a147c
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960312225120.27882A-100000@crl4.crl.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-13 21:54:06 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 05:54:06 +0800
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 05:54:06 +0800
To: jimbell@pacifier.com
Subject: Re: How's that again?
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960312225120.27882A-100000@crl4.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jim and interested C'punks,
In response to a Jim Bell post I wrote:
> >Hey, Jim, don't forget me. You are the only person I have ever
> >specifically UNinvited to one of my parties in over a decade of
> >hosting same. I guess that makes you special.
To which Jim replied:
> You're confused. You're describe YOUR reaction to ME, not MY reaction to
> YOU. And I am unaware of being invited to a "party," and now that I've
> discovered what a sleazy person Alan Olsen and his merry band are, it is
> really doubtful that I would have enjoyed what was advertised as a
> cypherpunks meeting, but which you now claim was a "party." Your level of
> "honesty" is showing.
A) It is you who is confused (see below)
B) I'm not Alan Olsen (nor a member of his merry band, so I have
no idea what you are talking about.
C) There was a Cypherpunk meeting followed by a party. The
pictures are on the Web.
D) It is your level of honesty that is showing. As can be seen
from the two messages (below) I sent you at the time. They
quote you in pertinent part.
>From sandfort@crl10.crl.comTue Mar 12 19:04:00 1996
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 22:59:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl10.crl.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: PARTY-PARTY-PARTY
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jim,
You wrote:
> Putting the nearest city in the note would have been helpful.
Did you try looking at the actual invitation?
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>From sandfort@crl12.crl.comTue Mar 12 19:04:17 1996
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 1996 08:24:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl12.crl.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: PARTY-PARTY-PARTY
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SANDY SANDFORT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jim,
You moaned:
> I didn't feel inclined to waste 2-3 minutes of my time cranking
> up Netscape, and looking at a homepage or whereever the actual
> information was.
>
> I consider such behavior exceedingly rude.
I feel your pain. Invitation withdrawn; problem solved.
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOW do you remember?
S a n d y
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Return to March 1996
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”
1996-03-13 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 05:54:06 +0800) - Re: How’s that again? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>