From: Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
To: os <os@cs.strath.ac.uk>
Message Hash: efcf1da2b3e8314a5c5d27e228209c1a42da87f0ee1c4d1cbe0c6cddf8164938
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9603272237.A8448-0100000@netcom3>
Reply To: <31595F37.2781@cs.strath.ac.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-29 12:44:32 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 20:44:32 +0800
From: Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 20:44:32 +0800
To: os <os@cs.strath.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Why Americans feel no compulsion to learn foreign languages
In-Reply-To: <31595F37.2781@cs.strath.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9603272237.A8448-0100000@netcom3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 27 Mar 1996, os wrote:
TCMay wrote
> >There is not a single foreign language I can think of it that would help me
> >in my goals or help anyone I know.
Oyvind wrote
> I have never known anyone being disadvantaged by knowing another
> language than their mother tongue.
I'd say Oyvind is right.
If you can't speak Spanish the only jobs available in
Southern Florida are with the federal government.
If you can't speak French, you can't get a job in
northern New Hampshire, or northern Vermont.
One other advantage to knowing a language other than
English. Legal encryption. << Unless a federal law
bans the
use of any language other than English for any purpose,
which would be a violation of NAFTA, not that the US hasn't
allready violated NAFTA. >>
So if the use of encryption is banned, just switch to writing
everything in something like Xhosa, or Chinese, using the
Wade Giles transliteration, or Dervish. << Heck, do all
your important stuff in languages like that, and then
encrypt it with PGP. Would the cryptanalysts recognise
the plain text, even if they had it? >>
xan
jonathon
grafolog@netcom.com
Return to March 1996
Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”