1996-03-08 - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols

Header Data

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: f2ede3405090538edaae804c9143c7ab353aee54dd4f5b8061e595d133caf2e7
Message ID: <199602292208.RAA19010@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199602292202.RAA19004@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-08 01:57:08 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 09:57:08 +0800

Raw message

From: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 09:57:08 +0800
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols
In-Reply-To: <199602292202.RAA19004@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <199602292208.RAA19010@toxicwaste.media.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> Yes, but we have to assume that the need for central key servers would
> go away if we had a way of distributing the data around, which would
> reduce the problem substantially...

Oh, of course the central keyserver model would disappear, but I'm
still trying to design a system which is as compact as possible.

-derek

Thread

• Return to March 1996

• Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>”
• Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>”
• Return to “Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>”
• Return to “cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)”
• Return to “Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>”
• Return to “Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>”
• Return to “lmccarth@cs.umass.edu”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”

• Return to “Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>”

• 1996-03-01 (Fri, 1 Mar 1996 09:13:40 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
  • 1996-03-01 (Thu, 29 Feb 96 16:17:26 PST) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
  • 1996-03-01 (Fri, 1 Mar 1996 09:41:48 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
    • 1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 09:58:49 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 09:57:08 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
    • 1996-03-09 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 01:37:06 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
  • 1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 10:04:04 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1996-03-01 (Fri, 1 Mar 1996 14:20:26 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
      • 1996-03-02 (Sat, 2 Mar 1996 08:05:38 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1996-03-02 (Sat, 2 Mar 1996 14:22:25 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
    • 1996-03-02 (Sat, 2 Mar 1996 14:28:08 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
      • 1996-03-01 (Fri, 1 Mar 96 08:06:47 PST) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
        • 1996-03-05 (Tue, 5 Mar 1996 19:48:46 +0800) - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
        • 1996-03-09 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 01:38:28 +0800) - Re: key cert. distrib. and management (Was: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols) - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu