From: rollo@artvark.com (Rollo Silver)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fc16f0aac370bb79d507d6339954fe7eb1c85cba63aaa69ffb5203ad1915af3a
Message ID: <v02130504ad82540e495c@[198.59.115.164]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-30 08:39:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 16:39:26 +0800
From: rollo@artvark.com (Rollo Silver)
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 16:39:26 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: java security
Message-ID: <v02130504ad82540e495c@[198.59.115.164]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>Based on recent events, as soon as you implement anything in Java you are
>making the creation of a secure ANYTHING a highly uncertain venture. You
>have just made it MUCH MORE difficult to ensure security, not less,
>given the current state of the Java art.
I will be spending a fair part of my time over the next few months
investigating java security, especially from the point of view of trying to
break it.
I'd like to hear from coderpunks/cypherpunks having ideas about how to
break it, especially if you don't have the time/energy to pursue the idea
to fruition yourself.
Rollo Silver | e-mail: rollo@artvark.com |
Artvark | Home page: http://www.artvark.com/artvark/ |
PO Box 219 | Voice: 505-586-0197 |
San Cristobal, NM 87564 USA | Compuserve 71174,1453 |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Return to March 1996
Return to “rollo@artvark.com (Rollo Silver)”
1996-03-30 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 16:39:26 +0800) - java security - rollo@artvark.com (Rollo Silver)