1996-04-13 - Re: Spinners and compression functions
Header Data
From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: JonWienke@aol.com
Message Hash: 0944dc02390a73a21691aa809dde70900145c60008a046fb5d06d01e1bc29a08
Message ID: <01I3GRB38EY28Y510B@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-13 03:31:14 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 11:31:14 +0800
Raw message
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 11:31:14 +0800
To: JonWienke@aol.com
Subject: Re: Spinners and compression functions
Message-ID: <01I3GRB38EY28Y510B@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I have had a somewhat related idea to this on compression regarding
steaography and which bits are the best ones to use. How about those that a
lossy compression method that's reasonable loses first? These are the ones that
aren't going to be noticed by the viewer, and (if the compression method is
good) will have at least somewhat higher entropy than the rest.
-Allen
Thread
Return to April 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 11:31:14 +0800) - Re: Spinners and compression functions - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>