1996-04-05 - Re: e$ Signorage
Header Data
From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: James Gleick <gleick@around.com>
Message Hash: 119016e4b297991926ec07ddc184fefbbf71f1f05159386607cfc19054c2b8a4
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960404231459.28168A-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <1.5.4b13.32.19960404143637.006a92b8@pop3.interramp.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-05 14:56:49 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 22:56:49 +0800
Raw message
From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 22:56:49 +0800
To: James Gleick <gleick@around.com>
Subject: Re: e$ Signorage
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4b13.32.19960404143637.006a92b8@pop3.interramp.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960404231459.28168A-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 4 Apr 1996, James Gleick wrote:
> Seigniorage is actually the Government's interest income on all the
>currency in circulation. It's not obvious, but it's true, that the Fed
And there I was thinking it was the right for Greenspan to sleep with any
unmarried woman on the eve of her wedding...
---
They say in online country So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA Which side are you on?
National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37 APL-CPIO
Thread
Return to April 1996
- Return to “James Gleick <gleick@around.com>”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
Return to “Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>”
- 1996-04-04 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 06:50:42 +0800) - Re: e$ Signorage - James Gleick <gleick@around.com>
- 1996-04-05 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 22:56:49 +0800) - Re: e$ Signorage - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 15:44:35 +0800) - Re: e$ Signorage - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>