1996-04-01 - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: JonWienke@aol.com
Message Hash: 18de3080971171aba15948c99767924e13d728d33fb15f73b28d76312c4a91e9
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960331155257.18816D-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Reply To: <960331120551_366431213@emout06.mail.aol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-01 03:16:08 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 11:16:08 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 11:16:08 +0800
To: JonWienke@aol.com
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
In-Reply-To: <960331120551_366431213@emout06.mail.aol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960331155257.18816D-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 31 Mar 1996 JonWienke@aol.com wrote:

> >My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
> >"In fact, had Unicorn not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
> >Detweiler might not have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
> >00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
> 
> Unicorn = Detweiler = Agent Provocateur


Uh huh, whatever.

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information






Thread