1996-04-05 - Re: Note: Problems Confronting the Asset Concealer [Part 1 of 2 ofVolume I]

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Message Hash: 23f5f5e505b2ac1b7c8ff98715006a3bff6dd4f9f9dc7b695d4e101e4e2f6b20
Message ID: <01I35JEYE35K8ZE6BJ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-05 07:53:20 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 15:53:20 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 15:53:20 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Subject: Re: Note: Problems Confronting the Asset Concealer [Part 1 of 2 ofVolume I]
Message-ID: <01I35JEYE35K8ZE6BJ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	A very interesting essay, although I haven't had time to read over it
in full (3 papers and an oral presentation due). I do have one question, and
it concerns the introduction. You state that you are leaving out material that
is currently in use - i.e., some of the most useful material. Why? I know that
you don't currently have a fully anonymous nym... but if that was the reason,
why not just release it under a fully anonymous nym? Mistrust of the remailers,
or what?
	-Allen 





Thread