From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3ae388560496972e40f7c258ee4dbc4d2829c76a14a2947a40cd3cb5635ac147
Message ID: <199604110635.XAA08339@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-11 15:45:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 23:45:00 +0800
From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 23:45:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: why compression doesn't perfectly even out entropy
Message-ID: <199604110635.XAA08339@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:36 PM 4/9/96 -0400, JonWienke@aol.com wrote:
> Would anyone like to propose a means of measuring entropy that we can all
> agree on? I haven't seen anything yet that everyone likes.
Nor will you: To measure entropy is a deep unsolved philosophical
and physical problem.
Only a known distribution has a well defined entropy. If you do not
know what kinds of order might be present in your data, you cannot
define the entropy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to April 1996
Return to “jamesd@echeque.com”
1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 23:45:00 +0800) - Re: why compression doesn’t perfectly even out entropy - jamesd@echeque.com