From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: Black Unicorn <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 3dba0a767fd825c3e60feedcf006201ba9aa55ebe016d8edfd7753ed18e62532
Message ID: <199604062150.NAA15092@netcom9.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-07 01:45:44 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 7 Apr 1996 09:45:44 +0800
From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 1996 09:45:44 +0800
To: Black Unicorn <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: "Contempt" charges likely to increase
Message-ID: <199604062150.NAA15092@netcom9.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 1:19 PM 4/6/96 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote:
>I might add that the Cayman Islands are full of trust companies with
>provisions which forbid the disclosure of data to a client who is
>coerced. A law on the books refuses to recognize "consent" orders made
>under judicial compulsion. This would give the appearance of total
>unavailability of evidence and suggest the futility of contempt
>charges. Yet courts have still, and with no small measure of success,
>imposed sanctions on witnesses so protected.
It is one thing to believe that you might be able to change a human's mind
by threatening another human via jail. (It reminds me of many bad movies.)
It is quite a different level of hubris to think that a similar action
could overcome mathematical probability. However, I am unable to predict
the actions of anyone who believes that the Supreme Court is the top
law-giver of the Universe.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | The CDA means | Periwinkle -- Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506 | lost jobs and | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | dead teenagers | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to April 1996
Return to “frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)”
1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 09:45:44 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)