1996-04-21 - Re: On computer face recognition:

Header Data

From: Jonathan Litt <littlitt@MIT.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4659cc3b3d3508de89cff469a3d1e59802a5766b109233b53a548e8191c3c8a8
Message ID: <199604210013.UAA04209@hazelwood.mit.edu>
Reply To: <199604120630.XAA14255@dns1.noc.best.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-21 04:57:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 12:57:49 +0800

Raw message

From: Jonathan Litt <littlitt@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 12:57:49 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: On computer face recognition:
In-Reply-To: <199604120630.XAA14255@dns1.noc.best.net>
Message-ID: <199604210013.UAA04209@hazelwood.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



  geeman@best.com writes:
   > Subject: Re: On computer face recognition:
   > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 23:30:49 -0700
   >
   > There was a piece, I _think_ in Scientific American, tho it might
   > have been an AI journal, on face recognition by use of neural
   > nets together with what were called "eigenface" images: These
   > eigenfaces each have specific characteristics, which when
   > combined together can closely approximate a specific face image.
   > The target face was analyzed in terms of closeness-of-match to a
   > small set of eigenfaces, on the order of 5 to 8, I think.
   > Results of course were promising (else why write about it, eh?)
   > if not excellent.

You are thinking of the article in Scientific American about the
Vision and Modeling group at the MIT Media Lab. For face recognition
stuff, check out:

http://www-white.media.mit.edu/vismod/demos/facerec/index.html

Crypto and privacy relevance? Lots, I imagine.

-jon






Thread