1996-04-29 - Re: Anonymous banking

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Message Hash: 4983b6c9cb47b7c599f571a94ff8d73395d85b90ca594bf6c2d0c3d253a9a7a7
Message ID: <01I432OG4L8G8Y53B6@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-29 05:03:31 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 13:03:31 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 13:03:31 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Subject: Re: Anonymous banking
Message-ID: <01I432OG4L8G8Y53B6@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"unicorn@schloss.li"  "Black Unicorn" 27-APR-1996 23:07:10.42

>Well, using attorney client confidentality to shield things otherwise
>discoverable just doesn't work.

	Given discussions as to attorneys holding passphrases, et al, perhaps
a tutorial from the lawyers on the list (yourself and others, since
disagreements among J.D.'s have been known to happen) on what attorney-client
confidentiality does cover?

>There are many mail forwarding services that don't use attornies.  An
>attorney is going to charge you by the hour for this service.  I don't
>think you really want to pay for it.

	Most of them aren't anonymous, either... although that does give me
the thought of going to one outside the US and its reporting requirements.
They'd know who I was (or at least the address it was going to), but at least
nobody else would know. Any suggestions, since you've been writing of the joys
of nymdom recently?
	-Allen





Thread