From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6438d4ce4c316c3ec97d1fb92c9b2071db7028eebd89172a656ad74969907f9a
Message ID: <199604011124.GAA17323@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-01 18:47:37 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 02:47:37 +0800
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 02:47:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: NYT on CFP
Message-ID: <199604011124.GAA17323@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
The New York Times, April 1, 1996, p. A14.
Pioneers of Cyberspace Move Into Wider Arena
By Peter H. Lewis
Cambridge, Mass., March 30 -- Cyberspace is dead, many of
its electronic pioneers said at a conference here this
week.
As the Internet population has grown into the millions,
what was once a small, self-regulating society of academics
and computer wizards has been engulfed by mainstream
culture. But in their efforts to preserve the libertarian
spirit of the electronic frontier, the original members of
the cyberspace community have emerged as a political and
social force.
"Last year, it was still possible for people to say
cyberspace is a different place, subject to different laws
and different rules and that there is a Net culture," said
Hal Abelson, a professor of computer science and
engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
here. "Now you have such a large percentage of the
population on the Net, it just is not sensible to talk
about this as some other place anymore. What you are really
talking about now is the communications fabric of the
country."
In what was seen as a clear sign of Internet users new
power, several members of Congress announced, by telephone
and through the Internet, new legislation and initiatives
at the gathering here, the annual Computers, Freedom and
Privacy Conference. The proposals include the formation of
an Internet Caucus in Congress and a Senate blll to relax
the Government's laws restricting the transmission of
secrets over the global information network.
"Washington is coming to thls conference in droves," said
Daniel J. Weltzner, deputy dlrector of the Center for
Democracy and Technology, one of several public-interest
groups that seek to influence Government policy related to
cyberspace, "and I think it's very exciting and promising.
It's the coming of age of this community."
The members of Congress were wooing more than 500 of the
Internet's most prominent champions, who had gathered to
discuss issues that were once esoteric but are now
affecting millions of people worldwide: questions of
privacy, electronic copyrights, computer crime, the nature
of free speech, digital pornography, electronic cash and
grassroots electronic democracy.
The Computers, Freedom and Privacy crowd included its usual
assortment of computer hackers, academics and self-
described crypto-anarchists, and even one man wearing video
goggles with an antenna apparently sprouting from his head.
But it also included others who wanted to assess the fusion
of cyberspace and real space: Federal judges, lawmakers,
White House policy experts, corporate executives and
law-enforcement agents.
Senator Conrad Burns, a Republican from the real frontier
state of Montana, chose the conference to announce, by
telephone, new legislation that would remove nearly all
current Government restrictions on the export of
mass-market encryption software, which is used to send
secret messages over computer and telephone networks.
Senator Burns's legislation would also block the
Administration from imposing as a Government standard any
form of data encryption that would give law-enforcement
agencies the ability to decode messages.
The Senator's bill places him squarely at odds with the
Clinton Administration and the Justice Department. But Mr.
Burns said the use of robust data encryption would foster
the rise of electronic commerce, distance education and
digital communicatlons, which his large, rural state
desperately needs in the 21st century. While the bill might
have little chance of passage this year, conference
participants were heartened by what appears to be growing
support in Congress for a relaxation of the Government's
cryptography policy.
The proposal drew some opposition. "I think we'll regret it
down the road," said Dorothy E. Denning, a professor of
computer sciences at Georgetown University and a computer
security consultant to the military. Dr. Denning and others
have argued that the use of unrestricted encryption would
thwart the ability of law-enforcement and intelligence
agencies to conduct wiretaps on messages sent by foreign
spies, terrorists, child pornographers and other criminals.
On Friday, a bipartisan group of wired lawmakers addressed
the conference by telephone and Internet to announce the
formation of a Congressional Internet Caucus. Fewer than
half of all members of Congress are now on line.
Representative Rick White, Republican of Washington, said,
"The idea behind the Internet Caucus is to do two things:
increase members understanding of the Internet and get more
members on-line so that people can contact their elected
representatives on the Internet."
[End]
Return to April 1996
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1996-04-01 (Tue, 2 Apr 1996 02:47:37 +0800) - NYT on CFP - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>