1996-04-19 - Nym Server Questions and Remailer Suggestion

Header Data

From: “Joseph M. Reagle Jr.” <reagle@MIT.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6c67950c4dff2deb4ccd20f14798416584eaaa9db4dad366ff1c73b9aa762920
Message ID: <9604191659.AA01571@rpcp.mit.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-19 21:31:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 05:31:15 +0800

Raw message

From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 05:31:15 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Nym Server Questions and Remailer Suggestion
Message-ID: <9604191659.AA01571@rpcp.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


1. Do the nym servers lie about the times of being sent?
2. Do they automatically latantize messages? I get an very quick response
from a nym server, and a very quick response from the remailer, but a
message to the nym identity (which goes through both) takes a long time

*. For the purpose of mitigating traffic analysis, has anyone considered
creating a "delete-me" redirect, hence I could send a few messages to a nym
server that I know won't go anywhere, but I can hide my traffic in that
stream. Also, nym servers could ping each other and send delete-me redirects
admist all the jumble of the normal redirects. An easy solution is to send
incorrectly encrypted messages which are thrown away regardless.
_______________________
Regards,            I am a creationist; I refuse to believe that I could have
                    evolved from humans.
Joseph  Reagle      http://farnsworth.mit.edu/~reagle/home.html
reagle@mit.edu      E0 D5 B2 05 B6 12 DA 65  BE 4D E3 C1 6A 66 25 4E






Thread