1996-04-20 - [NOISE] Great line from Bernstein case

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6e24636aa66d442b10360de0118936a31c75c2a9ba8e791091faf8096adc5abf
Message ID: <v02120d03ad9dc19e2126@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-20 01:31:22 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 09:31:22 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 09:31:22 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: [NOISE] Great line from Bernstein case
Message-ID: <v02120d03ad9dc19e2126@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


This one had me laughing hard:

>Defendants [The feds. Ed.]also
>conclude summarily that both the definition of cryptographic software
>and the exemptions from this definition are clear to a person of
>ordinary intelligence. This seems to be a bit of dissimulation, unless
>it is a confession, since the ODTC itself mistakenly classified
>Bernstein's academic paper as a defense article under Category XIII.



Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer, DigiCash, Inc.

-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread