From: Gary Howland <gary@kampai.euronet.nl>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6eb16d2ceccfcf384f8197dd3463c28d523de3f957bdc5b36d7a64aa5b14772d
Message ID: <199604071315.PAA18136@kampai.euronet.nl>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-07 16:45:13 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 00:45:13 +0800
From: Gary Howland <gary@kampai.euronet.nl>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 00:45:13 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: e$ seigniorage (and is this the cost of untracability?)
Message-ID: <199604071315.PAA18136@kampai.euronet.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Wei Dai wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Apr 1996, Gary Howland wrote:
>
> > - What will be the typical time between the withdrawal of ecash
> > and it being deposited?
>
> I think this will depend on how easy it is to withdraw ecash. If the
> client software includes an option of automaticly withdrawing ecash from
> the bank when you don't have enough ecash to pay for the current purchase
> (thereby reducing the time between withdrawal and deposit to zero), then I
> suspect most people will use it, even though (anticipating your next
> question) this compromises their untraceability.
Interesting note - I think that if the time between withdrawal and deposit
ever reaches zero, then we have a e-cheque system (which is fully traceable).
Return to April 1996
Return to “Gary Howland <gary@kampai.euronet.nl>”
1996-04-07 (Mon, 8 Apr 1996 00:45:13 +0800) - Re: e$ seigniorage (and is this the cost of untracability?) - Gary Howland <gary@kampai.euronet.nl>