1996-04-21 - Re: Wiretapping v warrants

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: jim bell <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6f76898aaf59ed7c1880b8cdd03675a1ddba551b678c520001ffde77d2f020ed
Message ID: <v02120d16ad9f1b618a71@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-21 02:04:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 10:04:37 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 10:04:37 +0800
To: jim bell <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Wiretapping v warrants
Message-ID: <v02120d16ad9f1b618a71@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:01 4/20/96, jim bell wrote:

>I seem to recall a news item from Washington state within the last couple of
>years in which a conviction was thrown out because evidence was obtained
>with thermal-IR imagers.  You know, look for the hot house and it's being
>used to grow pot.

You know, it is cases like this that I consider evolution in action.

What was the fool doing growing pot in a house, anyway?

Any smart pot grower knows that you grow pot in grow rooms underground.
With a large septic tank above it. Through the septic tank, you bubble both
the exhaust of the diesel generator used to power the high pressure sodium
lights, as well as the exhaust of the grow room cooling fan. That
neutralizes the exhaust smell and provides an obvious explanation to the IR
scanners overhead, since septic tanks are naturally hot due to the
bacterial activity taking place within.

Amateurs.


Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer, DigiCash, Inc.

-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread