From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: alano@teleport.com
Message Hash: 7511d3194afcfb930bc9ea8de3683380b4fbd588abcab8c3449a03ef3a0033f2
Message ID: <01I3IDUODNBE8Y51D0@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-14 06:20:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:20:27 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:20:27 +0800
To: alano@teleport.com
Subject: Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet architecture
Message-ID: <01I3IDUODNBE8Y51D0@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: IN%"alano@teleport.com" "Alan Olsen" 10-APR-1996 02:41:54.68
>Forget the porno... What are the parents who believe in Creationism going
>to do when little Johnny runs into a good skeptical site debunking all that
>crap? What are they going to do when the little liberal kids are exposed to
>the works of conservitives? Or Biblical Inerentists kidlets are exposed to
>the debunkings of that faith? Or Dorthy Denning's kids (if she has any) get
>exposed to the writings of the subversive known as Tim May?
Quite. It's interesting in that regard that, as well as differentiating
between homosexual and heterosexual content, the W3C PICS scheme includes a
filtration scheme for attacks on religions. One wonders if they considered that
Scientology is currently (probably unjustifiedly) considered a religion?
-Allen
Return to April 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 14:20:27 +0800) - Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet architecture - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>