1996-04-15 - Re: RC4 licensening

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 79fc989da6379e1f28f9b6251dfa6dd542611b8fc11c6ca7f910b768121d602f
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960414222327.29016C-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <v02120d51ad975a9b17ff@[192.0.2.1]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-15 08:31:30 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 16:31:30 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 16:31:30 +0800
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: RC4 licensening
In-Reply-To: <v02120d51ad975a9b17ff@[192.0.2.1]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960414222327.29016C-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 14 Apr 1996, Lucky Green wrote:

> At 18:08 4/14/96, Jack Mott wrote:
> >Hello Cypherworld,
> >        Anyone know how much it costs to license RC4 or how RSA has been
> >handling the whole situation?
> 
> Who cares how much it costs to license RC4. Just use the fully compatible
> freeware RS4 (I believe?) code.

Well, if you're using RC4, you're probably using some sort of public-key 
based key exchange, which you're probably going to need to licence, and 
BSAFE is the easiest way to do that,  so RC4 is pretty much a freebie

Simon

---
They say in  online country             So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way                  Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man           Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA                   Which side are you on?
  National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37   APL-CPIO






Thread