1996-04-13 - Re: the cost of untracability?

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <weidai@eskimo.com
Message Hash: 8bd833a0b95c662e20893c9a30d91a73561a839ebd5d0fbcd9801f9a49af9d3b
Message ID: <199604130501.WAA02229@netcom9.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-13 10:10:22 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 18:10:22 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 18:10:22 +0800
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <weidai@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: the cost of untracability?
Message-ID: <199604130501.WAA02229@netcom9.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At  7:42 PM 4/12/96 -0400, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
>From:   IN%"weidai@eskimo.com"  "Wei Dai"  7-APR-1996 10:52:52.30
>
>>I think you're right.  There is no need for the issuer to pay explicit
>>interest.  The easiest way to eliminate signorage would be to steadily
>>increase the value of each denomination of ecash. ...
>
>        Another method would be for ecash to have a label on it as to when the
>issuer would redeem it. Until then, if you want cash from it, find someone else
>to trade to. ...

And if you are using a "first to clear gets the money" system like
Digicash, the holders can race to see who gets the money.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The CDA means  | Periwinkle  --  Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506     | lost jobs and  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | dead teenagers | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread