1996-04-10 - Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet architecture

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Message Hash: 8bf90f9278598742d30301678168ef9f456acedd88626c95777afa4da62780ae
Message ID: <199604091838.OAA02349@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199604091714.KAA27317@netcom9.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-10 17:03:21 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 01:03:21 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 01:03:21 +0800
To: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Subject: Re: Enforcing the CDA improperly may pervert Internet architecture
In-Reply-To: <199604091714.KAA27317@netcom9.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199604091838.OAA02349@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Bill Frantz writes:
> One of the migration paths suggested for IPV4 to IPV6 migration is to
> tunnel IPV4 packets within IPV6 packets.  IPV4 packets do not provide for
> an adult/minor tag, so until the transition to IPV6 is fairly well along,
> this approach will be ineffective.

Neither, for that matter, do IPv6 packets -- there is no provision for
them. Furthermore, were anyone to create an end to end header of that
sort, it would be eight bytes of wasted space in every packet in the
net, especially since the implementation of such a tag is a technical
impossibility as there is no way to force the originating system to
tell the truth.

The internet and the culture are coming into conflict in a big way,
and I don't believe that both of them can survive.

Perry





Thread