1996-04-14 - Re: [NOISE] Consolidation of threads …

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8fb35516f66d3d3167755efe2ceec284d4e0a7a9c2eb6def22d27a7aa0411979
Message ID: <wa7DmD88w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <v01540b0cad96f6491958@[193.239.225.200]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-14 23:50:55 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 07:50:55 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1996 07:50:55 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [NOISE] Consolidation of threads ...
In-Reply-To: <v01540b0cad96f6491958@[193.239.225.200]>
Message-ID: <wa7DmD88w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


olbon@dynetics.com (Clay Olbon II) writes:

> OK, I have a proposal that consolidates two threads that have been
> discussed recently.  How about proposing legislation that mandates that a
> byte is now 9 bits instead of 8.  This would allow the ninth bit to be the
> decent/indecent bit, thereby solving all of our problems.

Hmm. In the days of COCOM (a relative of ITAR) there was a doctrine that
individual pieces of a mosaic may be unclassified, yet together they may
form a whole that needs to be export-controlled.

Likewise 8-bit values 0x46,0x55,0x43,0x4B may not be obscene individually,
but together they comprise a vile, CDA-prohibited obscenity.

---

Dr. Dimitri Vulis
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread