From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: nyap@mailhub.garban.com (Noel Yap)
Message Hash: 91dae13f5d072f5d4318fe3462c392e5dac9fb942beb72a6e14484588db0061b
Message ID: <199604090017.UAA28573@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <9604082133.AA15440@mailhub.garban.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-09 06:25:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 14:25:46 +0800
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 1996 14:25:46 +0800
To: nyap@mailhub.garban.com (Noel Yap)
Subject: Re: RC4 improvement idea
In-Reply-To: <9604082133.AA15440@mailhub.garban.com>
Message-ID: <199604090017.UAA28573@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Noel Yap writes:
> The S-Boxes in DES were optimized to hinder Differential
> Cryptanalysis. I've seen no studies on the effectiveness of
> jumbling the S-Boxes during encryption -- even Biham and Shamir's
> book doesn't mention it -- but, I figure, if it helps, DES would
> probably already be doing it (unless of course the NSA thought the
> jumbling would make too good an algorithm).
Your conclusion may be correct, but your reasoning is faulty. DES was
built to be run in hardware, which doesn't make S-Box jumbling easy;
it was in fact built to be run on the hardware of twenty years ago,
which was far more constrained than our hardware is now.
Perry
Return to April 1996
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”