From: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 93b51e2c2997960863288df6aa23d2863e1acbe4b1b720a93f231683d1ef29e7
Message ID: <v02140b09ad916e6d8a17@[199.125.128.5]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-10 20:44:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 04:44:51 +0800
From: pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 04:44:51 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: No matter where you go, there they are.
Message-ID: <v02140b09ad916e6d8a17@[199.125.128.5]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hmm. Here's an interesting question. Let's say that there are 3
satellites in view broadcasting signals f1(t), f2(t) and f3(t).
The way the system triangulates is to compute the distance from
a location to a satellite by timing the arrival of a signal. So
if signal f2(t) arrives at t+3 milliseconds, then the receiver
is 3 lightmilliseconds away from satellite 2.
For sake of simplicity, let the coordinates be expressed in
distance from the satellites. (2,3,1) would mean a distance of
2, 3 and 1 light milliseconds from satellites 1,2 and 3
respectively.
Okay, so why can't I just tape the signals I get from each of
the three satellites. Let these be T1(t), T2(t) and T3(t).
Assume we can easily synchronize them so that T1(t-o1)=f1(t).
That is, we figure out our coordinates (o1,o2,o3), and subtract
the offset from each tape.
Then if we want to pretend to be at coordinate (a1,a2,a3), we
simply say that we just received values T1(t-o1+a1),
T2(t-o2+a2), T3(t-o3+a3).
Or course, I could be completely missing some neat feature of
DGPS. I really don't know the details of how it works and this
could be completely wrong. Any thoughts?
-Peter
Return to April 1996
Return to “pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)”
1996-04-10 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 04:44:51 +0800) - Re: No matter where you go, there they are. - pcw@access.digex.net (Peter Wayner)