1996-04-24 - “Separate but equal” as a racist doctrine

Header Data

From: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 93bc39318b1f6a90e2ee6b2846a917300fc50692c83c3d8bb6d85dee4d492021
Message ID: <199604240441.AAA07568@pipe5.nyc.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-24 08:41:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 16:41:06 +0800

Raw message

From: tallpaul@pipeline.com (tallpaul)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 16:41:06 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: "Separate but equal" as a racist doctrine
Message-ID: <199604240441.AAA07568@pipe5.nyc.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


For some considerable period of time the doctrine of "separate but equal"
was one of the major racist theories in the U.S. 
 
People who wish to organize for racist ideology behind this doctrine while
proclaiming they are not racists merely place themselves in the old racist
camp. Their organizing for (and their denials of) racist ideology does not
make them less racist, just less honest. 
 
--tallpaul 
 
PS: Oh yes, for all the other rightwingers on the net who remain silent
when rightwing views are presented but tell those who challenge the
rightwing material to stop posting because it isn't "cypher" relevant:
perhaps we could call the thread something like "Racist Code Talkers" or
"Why Don't 'Americans' Learn History." Both of those seem to have resembled
past on-topic threads.





Thread