1996-04-10 - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: ad4f7f9df235a0f23ee1a589a8a06aa3377beedda4f64e3a3abdb4884de6f50b
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960409192104.24728B-100000@crl6.crl.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-10 10:38:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 18:38:04 +0800

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 18:38:04 +0800
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960409192104.24728B-100000@crl6.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

Black Unicorn wrote:

> >I didn't respond to this part originally because I grew tired of typing
> >"Yadda yadda yadda" everytime Mr. Bell lapsed into another
> >psycho-political babble session.

To which Jim Bell wrote:
 
> And the rest of us are tired of seeing those non-responses!

Exactly for whom is Bell speaking?  Jimbo, please let us know 
who has given you a limited powers of attorney to be their
mouthpiece.  It's sad when someone (correctly) deems their
opinions too weak to stand without (dare I say it?) pseudo-
spoofing by reference.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~








Thread