From: Jack Mott <thecrow@iconn.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: af4de729ae5f02a8d8f80cda6b270e6627b560989f4b8c04b21dab79b0178ead
Message ID: <316551ED.28AB@iconn.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-06 01:47:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 09:47:37 +0800
From: Jack Mott <thecrow@iconn.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 09:47:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RC4 improvement idea
Message-ID: <316551ED.28AB@iconn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I got a paper from the cryptography technical report server
"http://www.itribe.net/CTRS/" about a weak class of RC4 keys. The
report said that with some keys, it was possible to predict what some
parts of the State-Box would be. I was thinking of a way to fix this,
and had this idea:
do some sort of hashing function with the key that derives a number
between 55 and 500 or something like that, then scrabmle the S-box that
many times. In this way, the chances that the State-Box will have any
correlation becomes extremely small. I think it is 1/125 to begin with
anyway, so this would make it around 1/(125*NumPasses). And since the
exact number of passes is a function of the key, the cracker won't know
how many times it went through. I tried this out and having 1000s of
passes doesn't effect the randomness of the state-box in any negative
way, possibly it makes it more random? If anyone has any thoughts I'd
love to hear them.
--
thecrow@iconn.net
"It can't rain all the time"
Return to April 1996
Return to “Jack Mott <thecrow@iconn.net>”
1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 09:47:37 +0800) - RC4 improvement idea - Jack Mott <thecrow@iconn.net>