From: Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
To: JonWienke@aol.com
Message Hash: b49c5ec2ade15522dce534a085af717961684cf8810bbbaee9353f9f76760399
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9604070949.A1206-0100000@netcom3>
Reply To: <960407011827_186212737@emout09.mail.aol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-07 20:17:44 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 04:17:44 +0800
From: Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 1996 04:17:44 +0800
To: JonWienke@aol.com
Subject: Re: e$ seigniorage (and is this the cost of untracability?)
In-Reply-To: <960407011827_186212737@emout09.mail.aol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9604070949.A1206-0100000@netcom3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jonathan:
On Sun, 7 Apr 1996 JonWienke@aol.com wrote:
> Interest-bearing accounts cannot legally be anonymous--the IRS requires
To quote TCMay:
National boundaries aren't even speedbumps on the information
highway.
Who says the e$ has to be based in the US?
Andorra, Liechenstein, San Marino, St Pierre, all come
to mind as countries to investigate, because they are
outside of the United States. << Has St Pierre joined
NAFTA? If so, that rules them out. >>
xan
jonathon
grafolog@netcom.com
**********************************************************************
* *
* Opinions expressed don't necessarily reflect my own views. *
* *
* There is no way that they can be construed to represent *
* any organization's views. *
* *
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
* ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/gr/graphology/home.html *
* *
***********************************************************************
Return to April 1996
Return to “Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>”