From: jdcooley@ix.netcom.com (John D. Cooley)
To: N/A
Message Hash: b7b9f5579c4f2b5d4143f09699ee6fd82f02712bd35f07927b39ad338514f21b
Message ID: <4jnd37$6no@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960327060017.0090a994@mail.teleport.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-02 16:51:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 00:51:50 +0800
From: jdcooley@ix.netcom.com (John D. Cooley)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 00:51:50 +0800
Subject: Re: ViaCrypt PGP 4.0 for Windows shipping
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960327060017.0090a994@mail.teleport.com>
Message-ID: <4jnd37$6no@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com> wrote:
>I have not seen this here yet, so sorry if you have seen it...
>ViaCrypt is claiming that they are now shipping the Windows version of their
>PGP 4.0. (I tend to not believe marketing claims until I hear from people
>who actually have it.)
I have had my ViaCrypt PGP version 4.0 for windows for 1 week.
>Does anyone know if there are plans for this version to be interoperable
>with PGP 3.0?
It is *supposed* to be interoperable with all PGP versions 2.6 and later.
>Furthermore, has anyone tried the new version?
I have used it, but so far have not been able to communicate with anyone
that is using PGP 2.6.2. I have communicated with ViaCrypt and they are
researching the problem. Yes, I used the option that is supposed to make
the key interoperable with PGP 2.6.2. I followed the instructions in the book
and the security note. Even did it again (generated a new key) just to make
sure I did it correctly, still no go!
I will not blame ViaCrypt until I know if it is my fault or not!
BTW, I'm using the Business Edition.
jdcooley@ix.netcom.com
////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Always do right. This will
gratify some people and astonish
the rest.
Mark Twain
////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
PGP Public Key available upon request
Return to April 1996
Return to “Ron McCoy <rmccoy@mercury.interpath.com>”