1996-04-23 - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: Steve Reid <brucem@wichita.fn.net>
Message Hash: b7f271cc53c612a587c82224c8190309ba08ed385a96eeb0f58e3d6e11be736c
Message ID: <199604231714.KAA14970@netcom9.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-23 22:17:32 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 06:17:32 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 06:17:32 +0800
To: Steve Reid <brucem@wichita.fn.net>
Subject: Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law
Message-ID: <199604231714.KAA14970@netcom9.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At  2:43 PM 4/22/96 -0700, Steve Reid wrote:
>Things are only black and white in lawmaker's dreams. :-/

Note also that there are programs which replicate and maintain themselves
on several machines in a network in order to provide reliable network
services (e.g. print spooling).  (The people at Xerox PARC, who did almost
everything first, experimented with this kind of program.)

If lawmakers are to come up with a rational law, a big if, they will have
to differentiate between a bug in a "tame" worm which lets it get loose as
a virus, and a virus which was meant to be destructive from the get go. 
And then they will have to decide what to do about the virus that was
designed to write, "Hi Mom!" on as many screens as possible with no
malicious damage, and bugs in it.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The CDA means  | Periwinkle  --  Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506     | lost jobs and  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | dead teenagers | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread