1996-04-16 - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA
Header Data
From: K00l Secrets <secret@secret.alias.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bb5c1683234f279c263a351bfa9b853474362b3dd49df57b2d05815b1c6648f0
Message ID: <199604160315.WAA15829@paulsdesk.phoenix.net>
Reply To: <199604141422.KAA05302@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-16 06:59:27 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:59:27 +0800
Raw message
From: K00l Secrets <secret@secret.alias.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:59:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA
In-Reply-To: <199604141422.KAA05302@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <199604160315.WAA15829@paulsdesk.phoenix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In article <Pine.LNX.3.92.960414121820.358A-100000@gak> "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com> writes:
> I haven't heard of any efficient cryptanalysis against Blowfish. I
> know there are weak keys, but they are difficult to exploit. 16
> round Blowfish can be broken using differential cryptanalysis with
> 2^128+1 chosen plaintexts.
Doesn't this assume known S-boxes, though? If so, since the S-boxes
are key dependent, is this anything to worry about?
Thread
Return to April 1996
- Return to “Dave Del Torto <ddt@lsd.com>”
- Return to “Jerry Whiting <jwhiting@igc.apc.org>”
- Return to “K00l Secrets <secret@secret.alias.net>”
- Return to ““Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
- Return to “s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca”
- Return to “SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>”
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”
- 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 15:33:58 +0800) - carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - Jerry Whiting <jwhiting@igc.apc.org>
- 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 20:23:19 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:21:22 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:44:13 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 04:34:45 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 07:00:23 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-15 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 10:02:13 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
- 1996-04-15 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 10:57:20 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 14:59:27 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - K00l Secrets <secret@secret.alias.net>
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 04:34:45 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 04:58:50 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 06:52:32 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 23:53:20 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - Dave Del Torto <ddt@lsd.com>
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:44:13 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 05:05:27 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
- 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:21:22 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
- 1996-04-15 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 09:14:21 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
- 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 20:23:19 +0800) - Re: carrick, Blowfish & the NSA - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>