From: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: bc15f618bc3e90e3f80627ec2026e2b1e91e0fe768cf7ee95b3671a3fa73be9e
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.92.960411124812.25002A-100000@julie.teleport.com>
Reply To: <ad91b30d0902100413eb@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-12 13:24:51 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 21:24:51 +0800
From: Rich Burroughs <richieb@teleport.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 21:24:51 +0800
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Anonymous Remailer threat: Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailer records?
In-Reply-To: <ad91b30d0902100413eb@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.92.960411124812.25002A-100000@julie.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 10 Apr 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:
> At 7:37 PM 4/10/96, Jim Byrd wrote:
>
> >The story is weirder than that. The first poster of church secrets (with
> >lots of commentary) was Dennis Erlich, an ex-scientologist. Dennis was
> >raided and sued, and is awaiting trial. His ISP, Tom Klemesrud, refused
>
> His ISP was Netcom. Klemesrud respresents Netcom.
[snip]
Tom does not work for Netcom or represent them, AFAIK.
He is the sysop of the BBS (support.com) that Dennis uses to access the
Net. The BBS gets its net feed through Netcom.
CoS sued both Tom and Netcom (in addition to Dennis). They claimed that
after alerting Tom and Netcom to Dennis' alleged "copyright terrorism"
the ISPs should have cut off his net access. Tom refused, and Netcom
didn't want to pull the plug on his whole BBS just to stop one man accused
of copyright infringement.
I hope I have that all straight...
______________________________________________________________________
Rich Burroughs richieb@teleport.com http://www.teleport.com/~richieb
See my Blue Ribbon Page at http://www.teleport.com/~richieb/blueribbon
New EF zine "cause for alarm" - http://www.teleport.com/~richieb/cause
Return to April 1996
Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”