From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 06:20:47 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Open Systems, Closed Systems, & Killer Apps
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960410141442.00766f04@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Various correspondents have pointed out that X.25 is an "open system" in
that it is not proprietary.  I knew that.  I was thinking more of
hierarchical vs peer-to-peer.  I have been under the impression that
TCP/IP connections are more peer-to-peer between different sorts of
networks (or nodes) than X.25.  Isn't X.25 more of a standard for a
single network?  Don't X.25 networks need someone more "in charge" than
TCP/IP networks, or am I mixing up different layers on the OSI reference
model?  Which gives me an opportunity to post the only mnemonic that I
ever created:

Read from the bottom up:

(and) Anarchists  Application
Progressives      Presentation (back when it was Communication, it was Commies)
Socialists        Session
Trust             Transport
Never             Network
Departments       Data Link
Police            Physical

DCF


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMWvBIYVO4r4sgSPhAQHmegP/bPmRjFRpbczDfQTpTbfGgnLmuvWp6cBb
J62Rp/LW0tOnBOW4rrf/d88AUTlh4sesn1daxn+3LEL1zgSaZromjW6i+lRSK+cw
AkShAuuTJUwzG44Li473au5b32jhw6VK2ZMTcZBWAo2f4kl5zLOgpMwKM1Cb6s8b
/StrGFRLmd0=
=5gXR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----