From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bfd2ccc9db3959fba4764ed0ab05532c39e2ab09bff446be689a7fc6ed435c2a
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960410202317.1705C-100000@kolo.isr.umd.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-11 13:43:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:43:10 +0800
From: Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@Glue.umd.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:43:10 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Money supply is fake anyway
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960410202317.1705C-100000@kolo.isr.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Garfinkel described it like this: "My name is Agent
> Jenkins. I'm an investigator with the secret service,
> working on a counterfeiting case. And it's tough. Last
> year, my office got a priority call from an economist at
> Stanford. The economist was looking at something called the
> money supply and velocity and both were increasing a little
> too fast. They just didn't add up. The economist finally
> figured an organisation was printing its own electronic
> money -- just like the US government does.
Banks "invent" money on a daily basis. You would have to counterfeit a
great deal of currency (probably more than it out there right not) before
you would start making a serious impact on the money supply.
That said, enough counterfeit money may change the way people value
money, and may cause inflation.
-Thomas
Return to April 1996
Return to ““Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>”