From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 19:47:02 +0800
To: mirele@xmission.com
Subject: Re: OS/2 encryption
In-Reply-To: <199604210544.XAA09283@xmission.xmission.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960421035428.21453D-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 20 Apr 1996 mirele@xmission.com wrote:

> I have received a lot of comment about my request for OS/2
> encryption...perhaps I didn't make myself clear.

[...]

> *That's* why I inquired about disk security.  Not because I'm trying to
> hide something from Scientology...but because I don't appreciate people
> messing around with something that I've worked very hard on.

Not to get too out of hand, but how is encryption going to prevent deletions?

> Deana M. Holmes
> mirele@xmission.com
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version:  3.1
> GAT d- s++ a C++ U P L E- W++ N++ o-- K++ w--- O++ PS++ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t 5
> X-- R- tv-- b++ DI++ D++ G e++++ h+ r* x++
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> 
> 

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com