1996-04-28 - Re: The Joy of Java

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
Message Hash: c1109d6463385741db58abe0251ab1fc350b6c12a9993d4b07c73ffc7e299aa5
Message ID: <199604272331.TAA04613@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <v02140b01ada85707e260@[205.162.51.35]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-28 05:37:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:37:25 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:37:25 +0800
To: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
Subject: Re: The Joy of Java
In-Reply-To: <v02140b01ada85707e260@[205.162.51.35]>
Message-ID: <199604272331.TAA04613@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Jim McCoy writes:
> Rather than trying (and often failing) to prove that unsolvable problems
> exist in Java why don't you present the net with an alternative that does
> not suffer from these limitations.

I'm not sure that an alternative per se is needed.

Java is overgeneral for the task that it is being used for. This
overgenerality leads to danger. I agree that in and of itself its a
nice programming language.

.pm





Thread