1996-04-21 - Re: OS/2 encryption utilities

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Message Hash: c32ed15aff91cdca8ae54f2a072b1ed0afd5e9eebb159bfd5b793b1db1c1cb9d
Message ID: <01I3RZ4OQ1KW8Y4XUR@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-21 02:44:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 10:44:18 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 10:44:18 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li
Subject: Re: OS/2 encryption utilities
Message-ID: <01I3RZ4OQ1KW8Y4XUR@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From:	IN%"unicorn@schloss.li"  "Black Unicorn" 20-APR-1996 19:57:53.83

>>From: mirele@xmission.com

>> Due to the fact that I have been threatened by the Church of Scientology
>> with legal action if I do not cease and desist posting encheferated
>> parodies of their secret scripture (per a letter I received from Cult
>> attorneys via Federal Express today) I am in search of OS/2 disk
>> encryption programs.

>Were I a Co$ attorney, I would use this to bring discovery violations 
>if I took you to court.

	How would this work, since they _haven't_ served her with a subpoena?

>I'm not saying they would pass muster, but they sure would be annoying.

	This is the Co$; they'll be annoying (or worse) no matter what.
Admittedly, letting them get more annoying unnecessarily isn't a good idea.
Now, I wouldn't disagree that she should have posted through a nym.
	-Allen





Thread