From: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
To: trei@process.com
Message Hash: c4b93fca436abd716c32966abbcccf09be805bb626fc266b43810ea594d7dd12
Message ID: <v02140b00ad88b40881e5@[205.162.51.35]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-04 07:22:32 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 15:22:32 +0800
From: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 15:22:32 +0800
To: trei@process.com
Subject: Re: Canada's ISO standards body?
Message-ID: <v02140b00ad88b40881e5@[205.162.51.35]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:50 AM 4/3/96, Peter Trei is rumored to have typed:
> Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu wrote:
> > I don't think v3 has been balloted yet - that gives you a chance to
> > explore one of the more amusing twists of OSI standardisation- you can
> > get copies for free of most drafts from the editor right up until it gets
> > standardised. Silly, isn't it.
>
> Haven't located it yet.
ftp://hesiod.communities.com/pub/mccoy/ansi-x9.ps I also have a PDF version
of the draft as ansi-x9.pdf, and the certificate DAM in the file certdam.ps.
jim
Return to April 1996
Return to “mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)”
1996-04-04 (Thu, 4 Apr 1996 15:22:32 +0800) - Re: Canada’s ISO standards body? - mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)