1996-04-23 - Re: 5th protect password?

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: jamesd@echeque.com
Message Hash: ca2e8ddfcfb8c30de1477858376135275992e1a423e34005e03eabb02b7359d7
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960423181823.006b2c0c@popmail.crl.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-23 23:14:38 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:14:38 +0800

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 07:14:38 +0800
To: jamesd@echeque.com
Subject: Re: 5th protect password?
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960423181823.006b2c0c@popmail.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       SANDY SANDFORT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

C'punks,

At 07:58 AM 4/23/96 -0700, James Donald wrote:

>Yeah:  fifty thousand dollars.  
>Not that it makes the slightest difference.
>
>On the extropians list a number of very large bets were made and 
>accepted, but nobody ever paid up. (Or very few -- I know of no
>cases.)

As much as I like the Extropians, personally, they haven't
got a clue how to implement practical social systems.  It
is trivial to set up a wagering system that works--and you
don't need all the "polycentric" blah blah.

>Now if Unicorn had proposed a bet for one hundred dollars, then
>I would sit up and take notice.  A hundred dollars is real money.  
>Fifty thousand dollars is hot air...

a)  I proposed that a bet of $100 which Jim Bell ignored.
    That should have made you sit up and take notice.
b)  Unicorn has the 50Gs and I'm confident he would have 
    paid up if necessary.

>...  Anybody who was serious about paying
>would not make such ridiculous bets.

This is a non-sequitor.  Anyone serious about winning
WOULD make such a bet.  Do you really think that a legal
scholar as good as Unicorn would just shoot from the hip
without knowing he had it in the bag?


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~






Thread