1996-04-05 - A new law in the making?

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dbc9da871cf97654719916d9158d91bd77b6e463afb946dc496800e05148cf14
Message ID: <199604050206.UAA01078@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-05 07:55:44 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 15:55:44 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 1996 15:55:44 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: A new law in the making?
Message-ID: <199604050206.UAA01078@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

> Date: Thu,  4 Apr 1996 00:24:08 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
> Subject: FC: CDA Court Challenge: Update #4
> 
> The court wasn't happy with Boe's response. It gave Shea and the
> government until April 17 to decide to include the entire record of
> the Philly lawsuit -- and said that if they don't, the court would
> appoint its *own* computer expert to demo the Net and blocking
> software on April 30.

This is a great idea if carried a little farther. Require courts in cases
using technical or otherwise special evidence to appoint an indipendant
expert to compare compare with the defence and prosecution experts.

> litigators who do their homework." (Of course, Taylor conveniently has
> deluded himself into believing the CDA is constitutional.)

Are *any* of the current legal actions involved using either the 9th or 10th
Amendment in their case?

> We're back in court on 4/12, 4/15, and possibly 4/26.

Good luck!


                                                 Jim Choate
                                                 CyberTects
                                                 ravage@ssz.com






Thread