1996-04-16 - Re: RSA-130 Falls to NFS - Lenstra Posting to sci.crypt.research

Header Data

From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: brucem@wichita.fn.net
Message Hash: ddf206ce6a24ca0fe18d8abb1cba8faf232d5019af8d2c3fbc89f93543603f91
Message ID: <01I3LZNNU4DC8Y52YJ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-16 21:40:19 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 05:40:19 +0800

Raw message

From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 05:40:19 +0800
To: brucem@wichita.fn.net
Subject: Re: RSA-130 Falls to NFS - Lenstra Posting to sci.crypt.research
Message-ID: <01I3LZNNU4DC8Y52YJ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


From: Bruce Marshall <brucem@wichita.fn.net>

>    However, I do feel that you may have a valid point when switching 
>"hackers" to "opponents of the research."  Anyone with an interest in 
>preventing or slowing down the progress in such a project would be more 
>dangerous in my mind than your average hacker.  

>    Preventing that from happening would be necessary if it is decided 
>that such a threat truly exists. 

	Actually, people would also have a motivation to turn in false results
if they were being paid (perhaps in ecash) for their computer time. If they
could take less time and turn in a supposedly correct job, they would be
able to be paid the same amount for less work. Fortunately, it does appear
possible to filter out bad ones. In creating such a paid system, keeping this
possibility in mind would be needed.
	-Allen





Thread