1996-04-30 - Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: unicorn@schloss.li>
Message Hash: e3aeae1a2cef302ae630c5a375a276d3fad35b62f63f2b24815e01badf37b227
Message ID: <v02120d20adab4429605e@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-30 09:15:48 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 17:15:48 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 17:15:48 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: connecting Uni to the Web O Trust
Message-ID: <v02120d20adab4429605e@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 17:56 4/28/96, bryce@digicash.com wrote:

>I mean, I could explain it to him, but not even counting the
>difficulties of communicating such complex concepts among
>humans, there is the fact that if Mitch is here, he can
>prevent the real Uni from seeing the explanation, and he can
>act in Black Uni's place as if he understands.  Then he can
>go through the necessary steps to increase our trust in his
>pubkey, as if Uni were going through them.

It is generally acceptable to sign a key after seeing a very easily
forgable driver license. Even if you have seen the person before on TV, a
similar looking actor could be substituted, the true person could be
brainwashed, and what if the person has multiple personality disorder?
Should Jim's public key become invalid once John or Alexis have taken over?

The PGP web of trust is a practical solution for an imperfect world. Yes,
someone might have wrapped Uni into a bubble. But that would have to be
some damed good bubble for it to last so many years.


Disclaimer: My opinions are my own, not those of my employer.

-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
   PGP encrypted mail preferred.







Thread