From: David Loysen <dwl@hnc.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: eb573f05f77f87d13b2ac25aa07f6202ec5365538bf3670fa80e5584f352993d
Message ID: <199604121604.JAA02423@spike.hnc.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-12 21:58:41 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 05:58:41 +0800
From: David Loysen <dwl@hnc.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 05:58:41 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: No matter where you go, there they are.
Message-ID: <199604121604.JAA02423@spike.hnc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
[CHOMPED]
> Close, but not quite:
>S/A is an ADJUSTABLE variable, not on/off. it can reduce accuracy to
>10 meters or 100 meters or whatever. It's a DoD term, not NWO term.
> The "this is where you really are" percision location (forgot
>the designation off hand) is ENCRYPTED (yes, there is crypto
>revelance here...) in the data stream from the satellites. The
>difference S/A makes is on the order of magnitude, therefore not
>"useless." It should be pointed out that different regions of the
>earth can have different degrees of accuracy based on the S/A system.
> I doubt S/A will ever be turned off, but this is my opinion. I
>know Jim's opinion. Discussion of this point is pointless.
> DGPS transmission are made from a multiple single points, which
>(to the best of my knowledge) are not networked.
> glenn
Does anyone else get a little upset at the thought of one Government agency
(DoD) spending money to install the GPS system, then making it less accurate
than it should be, and then a second Government agency (US Coast Guard)
spending money to improve the system by installing DGPS stations. Plus, in
order to get the real accuracy of GPS right now I have to spend more money
on a much more expensive DGPS unit.
Pisses me right the F### off.
Return to April 1996
Return to “David Loysen <dwl@hnc.com>”
1996-04-12 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 05:58:41 +0800) - Re: No matter where you go, there they are. - David Loysen <dwl@hnc.com>