From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: ecf5d2ac37ffd5b74ab4562fbb961a2c4577aeab84d0f76789818b481e3dfe9d
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960416192153.28185E-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-17 10:52:38 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 18:52:38 +0800
From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 1996 18:52:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Decision in ITAR challenge case
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960416192153.28185E-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I understand from an AP reporter that the judge in the Bernstein
challenge to the ITAR refuesed the motion to dismiss and -- if the
reporter is correct -- held that source code is First amendment speech.
This appears to conflict with the Karn decision that dismissed a somewhat
similar challenge to the ITAR on political question grounds.
A. Michael Froomkin | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law |
U. Miami School of Law | froomkin@law.miami.edu
P.O. Box 248087 | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's warm here.
Return to April 1996
Return to “Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>”
1996-04-17 (Wed, 17 Apr 1996 18:52:38 +0800) - Decision in ITAR challenge case - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>