1996-04-10 - [reputationpunks] Article on Moody’s

Header Data

From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f824f9cdfc9409c97fd9aa1ca2a22ba5e2466392ac2ec5938422c270eec782ec
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9604091832.A19718-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-10 06:06:11 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 14:06:11 +0800

Raw message

From: s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 14:06:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: [reputationpunks] Article on Moody's
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9604091832.A19718-0100000@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


This week's Economist has a nice tidbit on bond rating agencies and 
antitrust on page 80. A comment on firms that trade mostly on their reps.
Is an unsolicited rating by a for-profit agency an act of free speach
or an act of defamation?

Thread

• Return to April 1996

• Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>”

• Return to “s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca”

• 1996-04-10 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 14:06:11 +0800) - [reputationpunks] Article on Moody’s - s1113645@tesla.cc.uottawa.ca
  • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 15:26:01 +0800) - Re: [reputationpunks] Article on Moody’s - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>